I thought I would treat myself to an online purchase, and given that I’m constantly setting my stories in theme parks, I thought a book about the various safety failures might give a bit of depth, especially if I ever wanted to go all out and put a bit of a disaster sequence in there. So I purchased Theme Park Safety Failure$ by Jeffrey Stoneking and I’m less than impressed. My review is as follows:
[Note: all indented and italic quotes are taken from the book, word for word.]
I picked this book out of morbid curiosity, I have a love/hate relationship with theme parks, and I think most people have a fear of the accidents that happen in them.
This is not the book for people like me. Or, to be honest, people in general. It’s shallow enough to paddle in, with only vague references to the accidents but little detail (except for the one time when three teenage girls are described in gleeful detail). The author comes across as a smug little so-and-so who can’t wait to tell everyone how he always knew baaaaaaaad things would happen if someone built a ride.
He is particularly sickening when he calls a victim’s legal representative and is astounded they are not sure how to spell the ride manufacturer’s name. In the same story, he refers to himself as being like Bruce Wayne. Throughout the entire anecdote, he repeatedly congratulates himself for being king of the world. I think Jeffrey Stoneking might well be one of the most annoyingly smug human beings of all time.
He also delights in writing about the times he’s had the opportunity to make witty remarks at the expense of the people who design these rides.
When he’s not patting himself on the back for spotting the potential for doom, he’s making reference to his other works. He will bring up a topic, and then point out that you can read about his experiences in a different book. End of topic.
Also, the book contains the particularly distasteful phrase:
“The nationality of the six riders? Japanese. My bet is that their almond-shaped genetic eyes were a little more round, like their Anime cartoon characters.”
There is reference to: “flamboyant, engaging gay men and militant dykes who were busy parading about with raised clenched fists in an effort to generate awareness to their agenda” tucked away in there too, in relation to some confusion at a park where attendees of a non-park-sanctioned Gay Pride event were wearing red t-shirts, as were attendees of another convention, each unaware of the other. The author notes that “thankfully” he was wearing black. The story culminates in a bit of shoving in a queue; this is hardly the kind of hard-hitting story the book summary promises. The author says that when he was shoved he told the punk in question that “he was out of control and further announcing that the amount of gay men would provide him and his buddy an extra female orifice to adore and explore. Anything to be left alone.” I don’t know what this means, but I think I’m supposed to be impressed by the author’s funny retort. All I’m left with is the deep and weary sense that he is a nasty bigoted man.
And just when I think he’s done insulting people, he goes for the disabled, stating that:
“With the amount of vegetable-like disabled children the Make A Wish Foundation bring onboard, some of whom are incoherent to their mere existence.”
Admittedly, in that paragraph, he’s wondering how he could “lug” them to safety, but not for the sake of saving them, mostly to make a point on how irresponsible it is to keep building rides when accidents can happen.
There is no need for this kind of biting description of anyone. “The gay community” would have covered the story above, and “disabled” would have sufficed to explain that he was concerned about someone less than able-bodied exiting a ride in time of emergency. However, he has to slap everyone down with a joyful and spiteful description that reminds everyone that the writer is a middle-class, able-bodied male, and therefore better than everyone else. And don’t think because I haven’t mentioned it he hasn’t taken pot-shots at the overweight either.
It reads like a blog: shallow, biased, occasionally dull with a smattering of spelling/grammar mistakes, topped off with a bit of racism/homophobia. This is not something people should waste their money on. Instead I would suggest that you go to wiki and google anything you find interesting. You will get to read about it with more depth and less smugness.
However, if you like your writing lacking in depth, overflowing with salacious gossip, and laced with prejudice, then this is the book for you.